PDA

View Full Version : Sestak Call For New AWB


d90king
9th August 2009, 15:55
Sestak calls for new ban on assault weapons
Published: Sunday, August 9, 2009

By ALEX ROSE
arose@delcotimes.com

Two days after announcing his candidacy for the U.S. Senate, U.S. Rep. Joseph Sestak, D-7, of Edgmont, urged his colleagues in the Legislature to reinstate an assault weapons ban that expired in 2004.

In a release Thursday, Sestak pointed to an Aug. 4 shooting in Allegheny County, where George Sodini, 48, of Scott Township, used two 9 mm semi-automatics and a .45-caliber revolver to kill three women and wound nine others in an aerobics class before taking his own life.

“As we continue to see the effects of the violence in our state and nation, we must enact legislation banning assault weapons with the necessary sense of urgency,” said Sestak. “The senseless shootings of so many innocent victims during an aerobics class in Allegheny County, and of the three police officers in Pittsburgh this past April, are heartbreaking reminders that we must immediately address the loss of the common-sense ban earlier this decade.”

Police investigating the Collier Township shooting said Sodini bought his weapons legally from TGSCOM Inc., of Green Bay, Wis., the same dealer who sold a 22-caliber handgun to Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho.

Typically, gun control is seen as a radioactive issue during statewide elections in Pennsylvania, which has a large contingent of hunters and gun owners on both sides of the aisle.

Sestak said he is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and believes in an individual’s right to bear arms, but statistics following the 1994 implementation of the first assault weapons ban showed drastic reductions in police officer murders from assault weapons and an overall drop in such weapons being traced to a crime.

“With regard to politics, I believe that what is most needed and valued by Pennsylvanians in their future leaders in Washington D.C., is placing principle above politics,” said Sestak. “I believe this is the right thing to do for the safety of our citizens, particularly law enforcement officers, while protecting legal citizens’ rights for protecting their homes, and for hunting and other recreational purposes.”

Sestak is therefore reviving a bill that died in committee last session, which he and 67 other House Democrats had co-sponsored.

That bill would revise the definition of a “semi-automatic assault weapon” to include any semiautomatic rifle or pistol that has specific characteristics, such as a telescoping stock, and can accept a detachable magazine.

The bill also would prohibit the importation of any such weapon; “conversion kits” to turn weapons into semi-automatics; and the transfer of any assault weapon with a large-capacity ammunition-feeding device.

Semi-automatic shotguns, pistols and rifles like the AK-47, the SKS, the UZI and the Bushmaster XM15 would fall under the ban, according to the release.

Incumbent U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., Sestak’s opponent in the 2010 Senatorial primary election, said a hearing on the merits of such legislation should be held prior to any legislative action.

Specter pointed to studies performed by the Department of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control, which have brought into question the effectiveness of banning assault weapons, and said in his experience as the former District Attorney of Philadelphia that long jail terms were traditionally the best way to deal with gun violence.

“The study commissioned by DOJ found that although there was a decline in gun crimes involving assault weapons during the ban, a renewal of the ban would have a small effect on gun violence, perhaps too small for reliable measurement since assault weapons are rarely used in gun crimes,” said Specter.

Former U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey, a Republican Senatorial candidate, also weighed in on Sestak’s call to reinstate the ban.

“Whenever there’s an outrageous criminal use of guns, liberals like Joe Sestak always try to penalize law-abiding gun-owners rather than holding the criminals responsible,” said Toomey in a statement. “Sestak is wrong. We should punish criminals and protect gun ownership rights.”

“As someone who served in the military for 31 years, I’ve spent most of my life around weapons,” said Sestak, a retired Navy vice admiral. “I support the legitimate right to bear arms and respect the many, many responsible gun owners of our state and the nation. However, there are those who are committing egregious acts of violence and their reprehensible actions on innocent victims and brave law enforcement officers must be stopped.”

Link:
http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2009/08/09/news/doc4a7e3b441c31c312110150.txt

kenhwind
9th August 2009, 23:57
The biggest problem I have with this nonsense, is that the Assault Weapons Ban as currently written is nothing more than an ALL WEAPONS BAN.
If a politician "Believes" or "SUPPORTS" the Second Admendment of the "Bill of Rights" what part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand.

Aguila Blanca
10th August 2009, 10:18
Ken, the problem is that they do NOT believe in or support the 2nd Amendment. And they are either too ignorant or too egotistical to recognize that what they are proposing is contrary to the letter and the intent of the 2nd Amendment. They take an oath of office to defend the Constitution, then immediately begin attacking it.

kenhwind
10th August 2009, 10:33
Ken, the problem is that they do NOT believe in or support the 2nd Amendment. And they are either too ignorant or too egotistical to recognize that what they are proposing is contrary to the letter and the intent of the 2nd Amendment. They take an oath of office to defend the Constitution, then immediately begin attacking it.
Ain't that the truth. The politicos state how much they do support 2A, but in the same breath spout about "common sense" gun laws.
Well common sense IMO would be that 2A is what it is. But hey I didn't graduate from college, so what do I know?

d90king
10th August 2009, 11:16
This really is disappointing. I find the timing and content of this announcement very strange. It appears to be a very poor political strategy, that will lead to an uphill battle instead of the downhill ride that he would have had. He has alienated half of his base before the fun even starts. The good politicians, never put their cards on the table before they are in office. They just stick it to you after they con you into putting them into office.

On a side note adding to AB's point... Very, very few of our elected officials have any idea as to what 2a is all about. 2a is not about personal protection, that right is one that our forefathers believed you were born with. 2a was crafted to protect the public from an out of control government. It was designed to keep the power in the hands of the people and not in the hands of a tyrannical government.

Sadly we have far to few who actually understand 2a....

I have been a lifelong Republican, I now find myself leaning closer and closer to the Libertarian cause as of late. I believe the Republican party has lost its roots both in fiscal conservatism and social tolerance, pc garbage... I mean look at the option the party gave us in the last election. :scared:

Old Fashioned
10th August 2009, 11:34
This guy references crimes in which handguns were used then calls for a renewal of the "assault" weapons ban. Am I too stupid to see the connection? Interestingly, he wants to change the definition of assault weapons (which is already incorrectly used) to include almost all semi automatic pistols. That would ban the most popular type of handgun used today for law enforcement and self defense. As a retired Vice Admiral, I don't think he has had as much hands on with small arms as he wants us to think. Where do these guys come from?

kenhwind
10th August 2009, 11:34
I'm with you on all counts.
I voted for the lovely lady who makes her own Moose Chili

Old Fashioned
10th August 2009, 11:37
There you go!

kenhwind
10th August 2009, 11:37
Where do these guys come from?
Now ther's a question that doesn't have a legitimate answer IMO, I asked my self the same thing.
Me I dunno.

d90king
10th August 2009, 11:48
Am I too stupid to see the connection? Interestingly, he wants to change the definition of assault weapons (which is already incorrectly used) to include almost all semi automatic pistols.


They are now referencing the magazines that were used in the gym shooting in Pittsburgh... They were banned under Clintons 94 ban.

Old Fashioned
10th August 2009, 12:14
I thought the 94 ban on magazines was against high capacity magazines, but Sestak refers to any semi automatic rifle or pistol that accepts a detachable magazine. Correct me if I am wrong.

d90king
10th August 2009, 13:20
I thought the 94 ban on magazines was against high capacity magazines, but Sestak refers to any semi automatic rifle or pistol that accepts a detachable magazine. Correct me if I am wrong.



Sadly you are correct on both counts... I guess he wants to get rid of 1911's...

Old Fashioned
10th August 2009, 13:28
If thats the case, he better come in person and bring reinforcements. I waited too many years before I finally bought mine. That sounds like bravado but it sums up my feelings pretty accurately.