PDA

View Full Version : Brady Score's for U.S. Senators and Representaives.


Rich-D
29th April 2009, 12:15
The Complete Voting Record and Brady Ratings on Firearm issues:

http://www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/scorecard/scorecard.php?report=all

The newest Democrat, Arlen Spector is rated at 10% in their favor. Hopefully he will maintain that record!

Rich

d90king
29th April 2009, 12:36
I look forward to looking at this and viewing it through their eyes....

Carole-K
29th April 2009, 12:53
Does anyone else find it tempting to vote for or live in a state that the Brady Campaign gives a failing score to?

kenhwind
29th April 2009, 13:19
Gee I wonder where they get their data from? I was just over there and they have some posted comments about FL that are totally incorrect. Of course I've been reading the FL Statues to keep my foot out of my mouth when I post.
Any way they don't like FL because we're allowed, keep guns in our cars, get a CCW, and to shoot each other at whim, well we can't shoot anybody without probable cause but they don't see it that way.
Ho hum a lousy 6 points.

Carole-K
29th April 2009, 13:25
Honestly, fairness and accuracy are not hallmarks of the Brady Campaign's literature. Why let facts get in the way?

Rich-D
29th April 2009, 13:31
Does anyone else find it tempting to vote for or live in a state that the Brady Campaign gives a failing score to?
I moved back to PA, from NJ due to it's oppressive laws. If the laws become oppressive here in PA, I will move to a more gun friendly State. As a private citizen in Pa, I enjoy more rights, than a Retired NJ LEO!

Rich

Carole-K
29th April 2009, 13:35
When we were considering our options for leaving Florida we had two sets of laws we had to look at. Gun laws and home schooling laws (and a failing grade from the BC was, to us, a point in favour for that state). All other factors were secondary considerations.

Chilo45
29th April 2009, 15:31
Honestly, fairness and accuracy are not hallmarks of the Brady Campaign's literature. Why let facts get in the way?

That is a fact. And sadly it applies to the pro-gun websites as well. Way too much emotional / personal assumptions listed as factual representation, when a simple straight forward, non-emotional assumption based position would do the pro-gun side a great service. I'm not one of the smartest ones on the planet but it is very easy for me to see bias from both sides and I equally discount when emotions and/or personal opinion is used instead of straight factual information.

But I know I am in a minority as most of by neighbors on this planet are looking for instant gratification and immediate answers to perplexing questions.